Local power utility makes no sense | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

Mr. Tom Goodwin’s letter published on Dec. 16 unfortunately contains both misinformation and disinformation.

He posits that creating a Bainbridge Island Power utility would free us from polluting power sources. Not so. By switching from PSE to BPA we would only pay for allegedly pollution free hydro power, which is anything but pollution free.

The reservoirs are unfortunately major producers of methane gas due to decomposing biomass which water sources flush into them. Then the idea that switching to hydro power would necessarily be cheap and effective is disingenuous.

Nearly half of Pacific Northwest community power utilities charge more than PSE. Even though a 50 MW block of power would be available, Bainbridge Island used 86 MW last winter.

BPA could accommodate us, though we might be using nuclear generated power which provides 9 percent of BPA’s power.

Still, coal-fired power plants would continue to be required and the PNW’s pollution problems would not be affected meaningfully.

Fortunately, the Colstrip, Montana power plant will be closing two of its four units in 2022 and Washington’s only coal fired plant in Centralia is scheduled to close in 2025. They will need to be replaced by natural gas plants as there is nothing else technically capable of generating that amount of power in the near term.

On top of that, BPA power would co-mingle with PSE power in transmission so we may just wind up with coal-sourced electricity no matter what.

As for Microsoft, they have claimed to be powered by 100 percent renewable energy since 2014, but there’s more to the story. Their two major wind power purchases are in Texas and Illinois, to power their nearby data centers. They also purchase Renewable Energy Certificates to cover their other expenditures, but we don’t know where that power is generated and who uses it. So while it sounds nice in a publicity statement, the net effect for PNW pollution is a resounding zero. Misinformation and disinformation. Judging by the experiences of Jefferson County, instituting a Bainbridge Island Power utility would be more expensive than current costs and would do absolutely nothing to address PNW pollution.

Finally, with the city’s record of utility performance, why would anyone trust them with this infinitely larger responsibility?

VARON MULLIS

Bainbridge Island

More in Letters to the Editor

Oddo will look at all sides of an issue | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I’m writing to enthusiastically endorse Anthony Oddo for Position… Continue reading

Do your homework before casting a vote | Letter to the editor

To the editor: It has been wisely suggested by one of the… Continue reading

Vote to protect the character of the island | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am deeply concerned about the proposed Suzuki development… Continue reading

Wildsmith brings new perspective to council | Letter to the editor

To the editor: We are writing in support of candidate Grayson Wildsmith… Continue reading

Comp plan preserves our island’s character | Letter to the editor

To the editor: A recent letter in this paper, by sitting Councilman… Continue reading

Wildsmith offers a fresh perspective | Letter to the editor

To the editor: My wife and I strongly support the candidacy of… Continue reading

Oddo wants to serve our island community | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am writing to support Anthony Oddo for the… Continue reading

Candidate ‘gets it’ on environmental issues | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I strongly support Kirsten Hytopolous in her efforts to… Continue reading

Ewing is passionate and highly qualified | Letter to the editor

To the editor: We are writing to endorse the candidacy of Andrew… Continue reading

Most Read