Suzuki decision sets a dangerous precedent | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

At a recent council meeting, it seemed to be the attitude of supporters of the newest Suzuki development proposal for 100 homes — which passed by a split 4-to-3 vote — that those who raised logical concerns are uncaring NIMBYs, unable to empathize with those in need of affordable housing.

This begs the question: If we are going to ignore our comp plan, current zoning regulations, our environmental and increased traffic concerns, set a dangerous precedent for future development (developers will love this) and enter into a program where the cost to the city is unclear at best, why not build 500 units? If caring is on a continuum with those favoring 50 homes uncaring, are those favoring 100 homes simply somewhat caring and those favoring 500 homes the super caring?

For those of us who absolutely welcome affordable housing including most of the neighbors of Suzuki, this suggestion that unless you mindlessly support 100 homes you lack the caring gene is truly offensive. What we as citizens should want is a real affordable housing project — as opposed to one that subsidizes housing for those making $128,000 a year — that can stand up to a straightforward examination of the facts.

One council member opined that it was her hope that this was the first of several projects. And that’s the point — do this one wrong and where will the support and funds come from for future projects? A short-term feel good experience simply isn’t worth the price that will be paid later by those needing housing most.

ERIKA SHRINER

Bainbridge Island