Outdated wastewater facilities undermine water gains

  • Saturday, June 12, 2021 1:30am
  • Opinion

We’ve seen real progress over the years in efforts to prevent human waste from damaging Puget Sound. Still, we face a chronic problem with outdated wastewater treatment plants that undermine those gains even though we have the technology to address the problem now.

After years of protest, Victoria, B.C., finally constructed a wastewater treatment plant, ending its century-long practice of dumping millions of gallons of untreated sewage annually into the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Much of the sewage contained excess levels of nutrients, ammonia, fecal coliform bacteria, microplastics and toxins that harm all parts of Puget Sound and coastal ecosystems.

In another victory, we held off a move by the Trump administration and maritime industries to block implementation of a new no-discharge zone for human waste from boats in Puget Sound. Under previous regulations, boats could dump partially treated sewage anywhere in the Sound.

Raw sewage could be flushed from boats three miles from shore. The new regulations prevent sewage from being dumped within a 2,300-square-mile area of Puget Sound, as well as lakes Union and Washington. There’s even an app called Pumpout Nav to help boaters locate more than 200 pumpout stations in the zone.

These improvements are being undermined by inadequate wastewater treatment and persistent unintentional sewage releases from outdated Puget Sound wastewater treatment plants such as King County’s West Point.

Excess nutrients such as nitrogen in human waste fuel algae blooms that disrupt the food chain by removing oxygen from the water. Algae blooms result in fish kills and can harm people by making shellfish unsafe to eat. These nutrients also contribute to ocean acidification.

Sewage treatment plants in the Puget Sound region dump about 26 million pounds of nitrogen into the Sound each year, according to the state Department of Ecology. Those numbers will continue to grow as more people move to the region.

The good news is that Ecology is requiring about 60 municipal wastewater treatment plants to reduce the amount of nitrogen they release. That’s in addition to a list of other improvements recommended by an advisory committee of tribes, state and federal agencies, wastewater utilities and environmental groups.

These upgrades could take 10-15 years to complete. That’s too long. Our population is going to grow faster in the coming decades, making the problems worse and more costly to fix.

We already possess the technology to remove nutrients from wastewater entering Puget Sound. The Lacey/Olympia/Tumwater/Thurston County (LOTT) Clean Water Alliance has been doing it for years.

LOTT is an intergovernmental nonprofit that manages wastewater treatment for the three cities and county. It has the most stringent nutrient discharge limits of any wastewater treatment plant on Puget Sound. That’s because LOTT ratepayers invested millions to add nutrient removal at its Budd Inlet Treatment Plant about 20 years ago.

It’s been more than 30 years since Ecology required municipalities to update wastewater treatment plant technology. Ecology more recently concluded that Puget Sound’s five largest treatment plants represent approximately two-thirds of municipal wastewater flows. Had these plants upgraded treatment when LOTT did, we would see improvement throughout the Sound today.

Unfortunately, some cities have been fighting Ecology’s efforts to restrict nutrients in Puget Sound. Tacoma has sued the agency, claiming that new requirements would be too costly. That’s shortsighted because those costs are not going to get any lower and neither is the strain on wastewater infrastructure from the influx of newcomers. We can pay now or pay a lot more later.

Right now, we are all paying with risks to our health. It doesn’t take much sewage to close shellfish harvest or to make people sick. Tribes pay a higher price because pollution robs us of our ability to exercise our treaty-reserved right to harvest fish and shellfish that are central to our economies and cultures.

There might be some hope in President Biden’s plan to rebuild our country’s degraded infrastructure, which includes funding to upgrade water treatment systems. It’s unclear if any of that funding will find its way to Puget Sound, so we need state, tribal and local governments, and others to demand it. At the very least we should be following the federal Clean Water Act and state laws that require the use of “all known, available and reasonable methods” to prevent water pollution. A first step would be to stop using the Sound as part of our sewer system.

Lorraine Loomis is chair of the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission.

More in Opinion

Distrust in government cause of many COVID deaths

About 34 million people have fallen ill with COVID-19 in the U.S.… Continue reading

Massive reforestation effort needed

Massive forest fires in western parts of our country are not only… Continue reading

Voter ID just another bad GOP idea

When Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf ran his veto pen across a Republican-authored… Continue reading

We shouldn’t have to beg people to work

Iwas down the shore this weekend, enjoying the sea, the sun and… Continue reading

Newpaper’s policy on letters, op-eds

There seems to be some confusion by members of the public regarding… Continue reading

We’re simply reversing the skin color of the victims

When Thurgood Marshall was strategizing his legal attack on segregation in the… Continue reading

BIFD leaders say social media information inaccurate

On June 26, Bainbridge Island Fire Department responded to a structure fire… Continue reading

Slow down on BAC; what about Sakai?

The Bainbridge Island Metropolitan Parks District is playing a shell game with… Continue reading

Bob Scales
It’s BI who’s treating neighbors unfairly

The July 16 Review article, “They’re not acting neighborly,” is really a… Continue reading

Most Read