Lipstick on a pig | In Our Opinion

  • Thursday, October 19, 2017 7:30am
  • Opinion

City officials did their best last week to put more lipstick on the pig, but this porker just ain’t getting any prettier.

We’re talking, of course, about the city’s proposed pedestrian bridge over Highway 305, better known now on the island as the “Bridge to Nowhere.” Last week, Bainbridge officials hosted a press conference to unveil seven artistic renderings of what the bridge might look like, and concepts ranged from arched spans made of timber or steel, to suspension and truss bridges (think Tacoma Narrows or an old railroad bridge, respectively).

Why we’re even at the preliminary design stage is a mystery for most folks.

As public awareness of the proposed project has spread, so has opposition grown to the Bridge to Nowhere. Critics include not only those islanders alarmed about the massive (and by that, we mean ugly) changes to the Highway 305 corridor to make way for the Sound to Olympic Trail, but also some of the residents in nearby neighborhoods who are supposed to be the ones to most benefit from the new span.

Indeed, it’s the question of necessity that’s created the sizable gap between the city and the public on the project.

When pressed, city officials admit they have no idea how many bikers or pedestrians would actually use the $3 million bridge. Details on exactly how much clearing and tree removal would be needed are also in short supply, much as they were before the chainsaws were fired up for clearing the first leg of the Sound to Olympic Trail.

The more we learn about this project, the more we wish the council would abandon its stubborn pursuit of it and stop wasting taxpayer dollars on designs and consultants.

According to one of the island’s most informed experts on non-motorized trails and facilities, the bridge idea “was more the product of city staff and one dedicated committee member than it was because of a proven need or an outpouring of public support.”

Very little study went into assessing who the users would be, he noted, or how people would actually use it. The city’s Non-Motorized Committee never had formal discussions about applying for the grant for the bridge, or the million dollars the city would have to contribute to get it built. Instead, the city’s share of $1 million would have been more than enough, some believe, to build out the entire island trail system (which currently is funded at a paltry $25,000 annually).

It’s no shock that the Bridge to Nowhere has become a political issue in the council races on the November ballot. We look forward to the day in January when a new council is seated, and perhaps the words of a more famous piggy are quoted when the plug gets pulled on this porker: “That’s all, folks!”

More in Opinion

Getting There Is Now One-Tenth of One Percent the Fun | Peter Funt

I’ve just returned from my summer vacation, which I now take in… Continue reading

A Few Choice Words About Mueller’s Investigation | Raging Moderate

We now offer up a few choice words concerning the continuing investigation… Continue reading

Kitsap, Naturally: Rehab in the forest | Nancy Sefton

For me personally, it began with the sad sight of a stately… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Thursday, May 24

Today’s cartoon is by Christo Komarnitski, Bulgaria.… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Wednesday, May 23

Today’s cartoon is by Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com.… Continue reading

Is Your Town Bribing New Residents? | Tyrades!

The fact that the U.S. unemployment rate is at a 17-year low… Continue reading

Trump-Approved Candidate in Trouble in Pennsylvania | John L. Micek

Sometimes, even when you win, you lose. Just ask U.S. Rep. Lou… Continue reading

Trump’s 68th week in office | In cartoons

Whiplash! Time passes so quickly, we find ourselves falling behind a bit… Continue reading

Build new station in original location | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Again we have a threatening situation at our High… Continue reading

Most Read