The Shame of the One Percent Continues | Mel Gurtov

Speaking at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Sir David Attenborough called on government and business leaders to support, with practical plans, “United Nations decisions on climate change, sustainable development, and a new deal for nature.”

“What we do now, and in the next few years, will profoundly affect the next few thousand years,” he said.

True enough, but politically speaking, Sir David probably knows as well as anyone that precious few in his audience will be motivated to act decisively in the human interest—no more so than at any previous Davos meeting.

At this very moment, in fact, Oxfam published its latest data on global wealth distribution. It’s another sad rendition of an old theme: the rich are getting richer, the poor poorer.

Notwithstanding China’s remarkable poverty reduction, the rest of the world’s poor are getting a decreasing share of the economic pie. As a result, Oxfam reports, “the 26 richest billionaires own as many assets as the 3.8 billion people who make up the poorest half of the planet’s population.” In 2016 it took 61 billionaires to match the wealth

of the world’s 50 percent in poverty, and 43 billionaires in 2017.

For the world’s 2,200 billionaires, wealth rose an astounding $2.5 billion a day in 2018.

These people — the global one percent — typically take in 27 cents on every dollar of global income growth, compared with 12 cents on the dollar for the global 50 percent.

It doesn’t take much imagination to understand the real-world consequences of those figures — for example, that “about 10,000 people per day die for lack of healthcare and there were 262 million children not in school, often because their parents were unable to afford the fees, uniforms or textbooks,” according to Oxfam.”

As we in the U.S. celebrate Martin Luther King Day, we might consider what a single decision by those Davos participants would mean: a one percent tax on the one percent, which today would raise about $418 billion, enough to meet those health and education needs just mentioned.

Think they’ll do that, in between glasses of Champagne?

Mel Gurtov, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University.

More in Opinion

Today’s cartoon for Tuesday, Nov. 12

Today’s cartoon is by Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com.… Continue reading

Biden Will Win Democratic Nomination, If Only By Default | Rich Manieri

Joe Biden is going to win the Democratic nomination for president. I… Continue reading

Serve With Honor, Honor Those Who Serve; Or Support Trump? | Wim Laven

Starting as Armistice Day, celebrated for the first time Nov. 11, 1919… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Monday, Nov. 11

Artwork by Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com.… Continue reading

Happy Veterans Day – 2019

Artwork by Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com.… Continue reading

How to Lose the 2020 Election, by Elizabeth Warren | Dick Polman

Speaking in 1910, former two-term president Theodore Roosevelt offered some practical advice… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Sunday, Nov. 10

Today’s cartoon is by Kevin Siers, The Charlotte Observer.… Continue reading

Can We Avoid A War Over Veterans Day? | Danny Tyree

The words weren’t aimed directly at me, but I was recently flummoxed… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Saturday, Nov. 9

Today’s cartoon is by Dario Castillejos, Oaxaca, Mexico.… Continue reading

Most Read