The Shame of the One Percent Continues | Mel Gurtov

Speaking at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Sir David Attenborough called on government and business leaders to support, with practical plans, “United Nations decisions on climate change, sustainable development, and a new deal for nature.”

“What we do now, and in the next few years, will profoundly affect the next few thousand years,” he said.

True enough, but politically speaking, Sir David probably knows as well as anyone that precious few in his audience will be motivated to act decisively in the human interest—no more so than at any previous Davos meeting.

At this very moment, in fact, Oxfam published its latest data on global wealth distribution. It’s another sad rendition of an old theme: the rich are getting richer, the poor poorer.

Notwithstanding China’s remarkable poverty reduction, the rest of the world’s poor are getting a decreasing share of the economic pie. As a result, Oxfam reports, “the 26 richest billionaires own as many assets as the 3.8 billion people who make up the poorest half of the planet’s population.” In 2016 it took 61 billionaires to match the wealth

of the world’s 50 percent in poverty, and 43 billionaires in 2017.

For the world’s 2,200 billionaires, wealth rose an astounding $2.5 billion a day in 2018.

These people — the global one percent — typically take in 27 cents on every dollar of global income growth, compared with 12 cents on the dollar for the global 50 percent.

It doesn’t take much imagination to understand the real-world consequences of those figures — for example, that “about 10,000 people per day die for lack of healthcare and there were 262 million children not in school, often because their parents were unable to afford the fees, uniforms or textbooks,” according to Oxfam.”

As we in the U.S. celebrate Martin Luther King Day, we might consider what a single decision by those Davos participants would mean: a one percent tax on the one percent, which today would raise about $418 billion, enough to meet those health and education needs just mentioned.

Think they’ll do that, in between glasses of Champagne?

Mel Gurtov, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University.

More in Opinion

Representation that Americans deserve | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Senator Patty Murray continues to be a voice of… Continue reading

Peaches, the Wall | Raging Moderate

President Donald Trump loves him some wall. Not the wall of corruption… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Friday, Feb. 22

Today’s cartoon is by John Cole, The Scranton Times-Tribune.… Continue reading

Democrats eyeing need for higher taxes | The Petri Dish

Even with a robust economy, the majority party may seek more revenue… Continue reading

American dream: Bait and switch? | Wim Laven

American mythology posits a narrative for our foundation which rests upon an… Continue reading

Should the U.S. Government Abide by the International Law It Has Created and Claims to Uphold? | Lawrence Wittner

The Trump administration’s campaign to topple the government of Venezuela raises the… Continue reading

Trump’s 105th week in office | In cartoons

It’s time for more loony toons. Our cartoon chronicle of the 45th… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Thursday, Feb. 21

Today’s cartoon is by Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com.… Continue reading

The Front Line in the Abortion Fight is Closer Than You Think | John L. Micek

So here’s another reason why it’s important to pay attention in what… Continue reading

Most Read