Wyckoff cost may be asset

"Five years ago, a citizen committee charged with envisioning a post-cleanup Wyckoff site proposed a development plan, believing they had no other choice.At tonight's city council meeting, a second committee will propose that the whole parcel go into public ownership - to be used as a park, relegating development proposals to a fallback position. "

  • Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:00am
  • News

“Five years ago, a citizen committee charged with envisioning a post-cleanup Wyckoff site proposed a development plan, believing they had no other choice.At tonight’s city council meeting, a second committee will propose that the whole parcel go into public ownership – to be used as a park, relegating development proposals to a fallback position.Ironically, what makes public ownership a more realistic option today is the dramatic escalation in cleanup costs — to as much as $150 million.The cleanup of an area fouled during decades as a creosote plant is being undertaken under the federal Superfund law. The name is something of a misnomer, because federal funds are applied only as a last resort; the Environmental Protection Agency is charged with recovering costs either from those who caused the mess, or those who would benefit from a cleanup. In this case, though, the only responsible party was Wyckoff/Pacific Sound Resources itself. It is reimbursing EPA the only way it can — it transferred ownership to a trust, which is charged with selling the land and handing over the proceeds to EPA to defray the cleanup costs.But that won’t do the job. Although the developable portion of the site — some 35 acres of water-view property — will be valuable, it won’t cover but a fraction of the bill.Since the taxpayer is getting stuck, why then shouldn’t the taxpayers get the maximum benefits? And plainly, maximum benefits flow from public ownership and use, not from private development of another handful of homes.Public benefit is particularly compelling with respect to two areas — the shoreline, including the point where the creosote plant was located, and the far western portion, adjacent to the site of the 1942 forced evacuation of the island’s Japanese-American population, where a memorial to that internment is now proposed.That may require, literally, an act of Congress. But we understand that our people in Washington – Rep. Jay Inslee and Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell – agree in principle with public ownership of Wyckoff.We’re generally leery of pork-barrel legislation that benefits only a small constituency at great public expense. But this is different – the cleanup expense will be incurred anyway. The only question is whether the benefits will go to many, or to only a few. We urge our delegation to side with the many, and to act. “

More in News

.
BI schools better off with COVID than others in Kitsap

Bainbridge Island School District superintendent Peter Bang-Knudsen said Thursday that 95% of… Continue reading

File photo
WSF cuts BI, Kingston to 1 boat each due to staff shortages

Beginning Oct. 16, Washington State Ferries will temporarily operate reduced schedules on… Continue reading

.
Youth still slammed by COVID

Youth continue to be slammed by the COVID-19 epidemic. While the case… Continue reading

.
Neighbors make peace over access road

Since we’re neighbors let’s be friends. What started out like the Hatfields… Continue reading

Sgt. Ziemba
BI briefs

Sakai Trail The Sakai Connector Trail is nearly done. The contractor delivered… Continue reading

Ray Williamson Pool. Courtesy Photo
BI pool needs extreme makeover

Ray Williamson Pool at the Bainbridge Island Aquatic Center is showing its… Continue reading

2 face off for BI fire commission post

BAINBRIDGE FIRE COMMISSION POSITION 5 Tim Carey Education, work and political experience… Continue reading

Nov. 2 election to decide Bainbridge fire spot

BAINBRIDGE FIRE COMMISSION POSITION 3 Andrea Chymiy Education, work and political experience… Continue reading

Most Read