Open doors reaffirmed public trust

"Some suggestions for prudent, lawsuit-free land use decision-making: * City councils should be loathe to fiddle with the recommendations of the planning staff, presumed to be skilled professionals. No reconfiguring projects, adding or subtracting lots or what have you, when subdivisions come up for approval;* The best way to keep politics out of controversial, project-specific decisions is to leave them to a hearing examiner; * A council should not try to make broad policy changes through its decisions on specific projects."

  • Saturday, March 25, 2000 1:00pm
  • News

“Some suggestions for prudent, lawsuit-free land use decision-making: * City councils should be loathe to fiddle with the recommendations of the planning staff, presumed to be skilled professionals. No reconfiguring projects, adding or subtracting lots or what have you, when subdivisions come up for approval;* The best way to keep politics out of controversial, project-specific decisions is to leave them to a hearing examiner; * A council should not try to make broad policy changes through its decisions on specific projects. And when hearing an appeal, rely on the facts and the law – not on public passions.We are able to relay these observations to readers – from among many offered in a council training session this week – thanks to a responsive Mayor Dwight Sutton and and city Administrator Lynn Nordby.Wednesday in this column, we took strong issue with the administration’s plans to hold a two hour training session on land-use law, litigation and liability, behind closed doors in an executive session. We maintained then, and still do, that such a session would have violated the state’s Open Public Meetings Act. Later that morning, council members Norm Wooldridge and Christine Nasser and chair Merrill Robison expressed misgivings over the session, and announced their intention to skip the meeting or simply walk out if it was not open to the public. Councilman Michael Pollock already had weighed in with concerns of his own; we have no idea where others stood.And this was not just the press making noise to stir something up. At city hall Wednesday, we crossed paths with a local land use professional busy at the planning counter. If the meeting remained closed to the public, he said, he intended to go anyway just to be thrown out – on principle.Shortly after 1 p.m., as we were hand-delivering a formal objection to the closed-door session to the mayor’s office, Nordby announced that the program would be modified slightly – presumably to tone down its nebulous legal advice aspects – and the doors would be opened to the public. And so, in came the citizens and the press, in fair numbers. Was it worth the fuss?The city’s attorneys say the seminar as envisioned would have been appropriate for an executive session; ours say it wasn’t. And therein lies the problematic nature of the closed-door meeting – the only people who really know if it’s appropriate are those inside. And they’re obligated not to talk about it.An executive session, though, is more than what transpires around the table. It represents a bond of trust between the citizenry and their elected officials. In creating a law that allows public agencies to meet behind closed doors for a few very specific purposes, the public is investing its faith that such sessions won’t be abused. It’s not a privilege to be taken lightly, and sometimes we all need to be reminded as much.Wednesday, the majority of the council, and eventually the administration itself, opted to affirm that bond of trust.The downside was that in forcing the doors of the training session open, we had to actually go to it. And coupled with the lengthy council meeting that followed, that made for about seven straight hours in those little Commons chairs, a challenge for even the hardiest of bottoms.But as noted above, the session proved both dynamic and provocative, as a number of citizens and city staff in attendance agreed. And they were able to attend, because Sutton, Nordby and the city council showed the wisdom and grace to keep the doors open. For that, we thank them all.”

More in News

Bainbridge parks comprehenisve plan gets another review

Bainbridge park officials will take another look at the draft parks comprehensive… Continue reading

Council appears willing to increase funding for new police station to make it ‘greener’

Bainbridge Island officials hope to begin construction on the makeover of CHI… Continue reading

Public hearing on Winslow Hotel pushed back until January

Bainbridge city officials announced Friday the hearing scheduled for the controversial Winslow… Continue reading

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to host Walking Tour Nativity

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints will host a Walking… Continue reading

Bainbridge blotter | Get off the phone

Selected reports from the Bainbridge Island Police Department blotter. FRIDAY, NOV. 15… Continue reading

Bainbridge police will add patrols for DUI drivers

Bainbridge police will join with law enforcement agencies across Kitsap County in… Continue reading

TRAVEL ADVISORY | New temporary sailing schedule for Bainbridge, Bremerton coming in January

A temporary sailing schedule for the Bainbridge Island-Seattle ferry route will be… Continue reading

Bainbridge blotter | Speeding while DUI

Selected reports from the Bainbridge Island Police Department blotter. THURSDAY, NOV. 14… Continue reading

Whistleblower on Councilwoman Nassar’s permit problems worried about retaliation after ‘bogus’ claims

The city hall employee behind the code compliance complaint that ensnared City… Continue reading

Most Read