Lawmakers propose limits on scope of Public Records Act for Legislature | 2019 Legislative Session

BY EMMY EPPERLY

WNPA Olympia News Bureau

OLYMPIA – Legislation proposed on the last day of January would largely exempt state legislators from the Public Records Act according to the attorney who led the fight against a similar bill last year.

That bill was passed in a last-minute move after a Thurston County Superior Court judge ruled in January 2018 that the Legislature was subject to the Public Records Act and had not been in compliance for years. Both sides appealed the decision and litigation is still ongoing in the Washington Supreme Court.

A public outcry over last year’s bill led to the intervention of Gov. Jay Inslee who negotiated a truce between the Legislature and the newspaper industry, which sought to force the lawmakers to adhere to the requirements of the act.

Senate Bill 5784, sponsored by Senator Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, explicitly outlines exemptions that would apply to the Legislature. “The people of our state value both open government and effective government. This bill attempts to strike a balance between those important principles,” Pedersen said in introducing the new bill.

The bill is unsatisfactory, according to Michele Earl-Hubbard of Allied Law Group who represented 10 news organizations, including the Associated Press, the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association, and the Seattle Times, in the suit against the legislature.

The new bill introduces the term “legislative branch” which is defined as including the Senate, House of Representatives, and the Legislative Ethics Board, joint committees and “any other agency that is subject to the direct control of the Senate or House of Representatives.” The legislative branch term is carried throughout the bill, as addition to “state agency,” previously used in the bill.

In the court ruling, the Legislature was not considered an agency; however, individual legislators’ offices were considered agencies, making them subject to the Public Records Act.

Earl-Hubbard said she “can’t see what’s left that the public would get to see” under the proposed bill. The proposal would distinguish legislators from other elected public officials in that they would not be subject to the same laws, she said. It would also continue to restrict information on misconduct allegations, which Earl-Hubbard says was at the heart of the media’s lawsuit.

“I was very disappointed when I read the bill,” said Earl-Hubbard. “This is being hyped as legislators claiming to have heard the message from the public last year.”

In response to criticism, Pederson emphasized that changes will be made to fine-tune the bill as it moves through the legislative process.

On releasing misconduct records Pederson said he and his colleagues worry that a lack of protections could cause a “chilling effect” for those coming forward with misconduct allegations.

“If coming forward in this environment means everything you say can end up on the front page of the Seattle Times, you might choose to suffer in silence,” Pederson said.

Under Pederson’s proposed bill raw investigative material like witness statements would be withheld from public record but the investigative report and determination on the allegations would be released after a determination is made.

At least, said Toby Nixon, president of the Washington Coalition for Open Government, “they’re putting something on the table so we can start talking about the issues.”

The bill last year was passed without discussion and on short notice, Nixon said.

Section 111 of the bill outlines specific permanent legislative exemptions that need to be cited in denying a request. These exemptions include:

• Investigative records that are generated before a determination of reasonable cause or dismissal of a complaint before the legislative ethics board or within the legislative branch;

• Memoranda from staff or legislators that contain legal, policy or fiscal options, analyses, models or analytical tools;

• Records of internal caucus communications like leadership votes;

• Notes taken by staff or legislators for the use of the person taking the notes;

• Negotiations between legislators or caucuses on bills, records of how a legislator intends to vote either in committee or in a chamber of the legislature;

• Drafts of bills or amendments that were never introduced.

SB 5784 is currently scheduled for a hearing on Feb. 13.

Emma Epperly is a reporter with the WNPA Olympia News Bureau.

More in News

Labor Day picnic returns to Bainbridge’s Moritani Preserve

The Bainbridge Parks Foundation will host the second annual Moritani Preserve Community… Continue reading

Bainbridge says ‘Enough’ at vigil against gun violence | Photo gallery

Islanders concerned about continued mass shootings gathered in Town Square Aug. 12… Continue reading

Dispute drags on over costs for first mile of STO trail

The city of Bainbridge Island is still locked in a payment dispute… Continue reading

Medina leads in campaign contributions in District 2 matchup

Kol Medina raised more, but spent less, than his opponent in the… Continue reading

Station 22 flag raising marks end of BIFD building spree

The American flag was raised for the first time this week above… Continue reading

Bainbridge council to oppose ‘$30 car tab’ initiative

Bainbridge city officials are warning that the potential passage of Initiative 976… Continue reading

Bainbridge Rotary hosts Attorney General as guest speaker

Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson will speak at the Rotary Club… Continue reading

Bainbridge may put cameras on school bus ‘Stop Paddles’ to catch bad drivers

Go around and it will come around. Bainbridge city and school district… Continue reading

No problems in Kitsap with same-day voter registration

There was no rush and no crush. Kitsap County election workers had… Continue reading

Most Read