Unlike Roth, Nassar would spend taxpayer dollars cautiously | Letter to the editor

Unlike Roth, Nassar would spend taxpayer dollars cautiously | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

While Rasham Nassar stresses spending taxpayer dollars with “caution,” her opponent, Wayne Roth, repeatedly (2015-2016) supported wasting our tax dollars studying the feasibility of a citizen-driven proposal for Bainbridge to takeover PSE electric service for our Island.

While Nassar never supported a PSE takeover, Roth, said “I believe it’s feasible” (Oct. 6, 2015) and “support moving forward as quickly as we can.”

On April 26, 2016, Roth made the motion to authorize a $100,000 feasibility study.

On May 10, 2016, while Council members Ron Peltier and Sarah Blossom pointed out, respectively, that the “primary responsibility of city council is to listen to the community and not spend this amount of money without knowing the community supports the study,” and ”people on this island will not support this because they do not trust the city to do it”, Roth said “I support going forward with the utility study.”

Roth said “I support the study and will vote for it” (June 12, 2016) and “The only option is to continue discussion, to go to community outreach aggressively… much of what I hear from people tends to be out of ignorance” (March 21, 2017)

“The notion of local control was absolutely compelling. I’ll debate that with anyone” (June 6) and “it’s something we ought to consider at some point in the future.”

But compelling fiscal realities presented by PSE’s consultant prevailed June 13 when council voted unanimously to “cease further consideration of public power.”

Remember: While Roth advocated for a city-owned electric utility, Nassar did not.

Roth also supports a new $28.4 million proposal for a new police station, having previously voted against a $7.5 million option, and for a $15 million proposal locating the station on a toxic site. Re: the $1 million pedestrian bridge across 305, Roth’s comment: “We’ll find the money somewhere.” Nassar’s our clear choice.

SALLY ADAMS

Bainbridge Island

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor

No bike trails To the editor: Please do not put mountain bike… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Do we need it? To the editor: Want. Want. Want, but do… Continue reading

Bike trail information off the mark

I’d like to comment on the article in last Friday’s Review, titled… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Save forest again To the editor: The Jones family moved to Meadowmeer… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Harrison boondoggle To the editor: The March 12 “second opinion” provided by… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Affordable housing To the editor: I ravenously read the March 5 Bainbridge… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Council unreal To the editor: I’m in favor of providing our police… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Health security To the editor: Given that more than 500,000 Americans and… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Ambitious plan In November 2020, the Bainbridge Island City Council approved an… Continue reading

Pie in the sky vs. road safety now

Four years ago, to meet comprehensive planning requirements of the state Growth… Continue reading

letter

Girl Scouts Our Girl Scout troop 44331 on Bainbridge Island will not… Continue reading

Letters

Wrong choice To the editor: The island, not just the City Council,… Continue reading