The faulty premise for PSE takeover | Letter to the editor

The faulty premise for PSE takeover | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

In his letter to the editor (April 7), Steve Johnson takes the paper to task for ignoring climate change in the “public power debate.”

You should be commended. That issue is a red herring with respect to Bainbridge Island public power. Someone utilizes every kilowatt of electricity generated in the Northwest using renewable sources, i.e., green energy. The only way to improve that is to generate more power from renewable sources.

Mr. Johnson’s letter states that climate change has been from the beginning the chief reason concerned citizens launched the idea of “public power.” If that is the case, it is the most poorly conceived basis for this debate that I can imagine. Public ownership of the power distribution facilities on this island cannot have any effect on climate change. All public ownership could possibly accomplish would be to transfer all of the headaches and cost of operation and maintenance to local ratepayers. Why would we take on that liability with no benefit accompanying it?

By the nature of a power grid, the source of power closest to a load, i.e., Bainbridge Island distribution network, is the primary source to satisfy that load demand.

And what is the closest source of power to Bainbridge Island? Unless someone has recently built a generating facility closer, it is Puget Sound Energy’s hydroelectric generating plant on the west shore of Hood Canal. On that basis, Bainbridge Island is already receiving some of the greenest power humankind can produce.

By contrast, if the Island were to purchase power from BPA and pay PSE to transmit it to our newly acquired distribution network, where would that BPA power have been generated? Who knows?

But for those who care, including Mr. Johnson, there is a strong probability that it would come, in large part, from that same coal-fired generating plant that Mr. Johnson and Island Power have used as a poster child for kicking out PSE. Ironic?

In truth, although factual, most of the above paragraphs are irrelevant, as are the arguments Island Power has put forward in support of their campaign. The real truth is that the only ways that Islanders can help combat climate change is to open their checkbooks and support construction of green power generation facilities and by using the most energy efficient homes and vehicles.

In my opinion, the Island Power campaign is nothing other than an attempt at a political power grab at the potential ratepayer’s expense. I will have nothing to do with it and I urge your readers to adopt the same attitude.


Bainbridge Island

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor

Appreciate coverage To the editor: I write in appreciation of the coverage… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

No bike trails To the editor: Please do not put mountain bike… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Do we need it? To the editor: Want. Want. Want, but do… Continue reading

Bike trail information off the mark

I’d like to comment on the article in last Friday’s Review, titled… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Save forest again To the editor: The Jones family moved to Meadowmeer… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Harrison boondoggle To the editor: The March 12 “second opinion” provided by… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Affordable housing To the editor: I ravenously read the March 5 Bainbridge… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Council unreal To the editor: I’m in favor of providing our police… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Health security To the editor: Given that more than 500,000 Americans and… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Ambitious plan In November 2020, the Bainbridge Island City Council approved an… Continue reading

Pie in the sky vs. road safety now

Four years ago, to meet comprehensive planning requirements of the state Growth… Continue reading


Girl Scouts Our Girl Scout troop 44331 on Bainbridge Island will not… Continue reading