Private utility customers are protected | Letter to the editor

Private utility customers are protected

To the editor:

Citizen oversight is meaningless for public utilities. This is in strong evidence given runaway power rates for the San Juan County public utility OPALCO, and a citizen lawsuit against Jefferson County PUD condemning its secret “executive” meetings.

Delyle Ellefson’s Nov. 25 letter compares PSE’s rates to the rates that OPALCO. He complains that the energy rate he pays to PSE — per kilowatt-hour — is “consistently around 10 percent higher” than the rate he pays to OPALCO.

What Mr. Ellefson doesn’t say, however, is that OPALCO saddles its customers with a massively regressive rate design. All residential users, including low-usage customers such as poorer households, get hit with a monthly facility charge of $40.54 — a charge that exceeds PSE’s equivalent charge by well over 400 percent. This OPALCO facility charge is projected to be $78 per month by 2019, largely due to significant costs for undergrounding. That facility charge is additional to any power usage. Oversight by the WUTC would never allow such significant and regressive increases.

Further, OPALCO charges a preferential lower energy rate to its high-usage customers. This low rate does not encourage energy conservation.

Unlike OPALCO, PSE doesn’t punish its low-usage customers with an exorbitant facility charge. And unlike OPALCO, PSE promotes conservation with an energy rate that goes up as consumption goes up. Unlike JPUD, there are no secret rate meetings before the WUTC.

Let’s stick with PSE and its progressive rates. The WUTC only oversees three private electric utilities, and they do protect PSE customers.


Crystal Springs

More in Letters to the Editor

We should unite behind a candidate | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I was a Senator Bernie Sanders delegate to the… Continue reading

Kudos to Kilmer for Facebook town hall | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Clever idea for a town hall on Facebook, perhaps… Continue reading

Let’s make the best of what we already have | Letter to the editor

To the editor: One of the arguments against a new hotel in… Continue reading

Leave Suzuki property as undeveloped land | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Ross Lambert recently wrote a letter in support of… Continue reading

Farewell and thanks to Angela and her cafe | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I would like to say goodbye and thank you… Continue reading

We need leadership on affordable housing | Letter to the editor

To the editor: We appreciate that rather than focusing on any particular… Continue reading

Thank you for your patronage, support | Letter to the editor

To the editor: During the past decade Bainbridge Island Working Studios has… Continue reading

I’ll be driving using my rules of the road | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I’ve lived on Bainbridge for 33 years. And it… Continue reading

Learn what we can do about climate change | Letter to the editor

To the editor: The harrowing pictures and stories from fires in Australia… Continue reading

Give a gift this year that will help others | Letter to the editor

To the editor: What a great idea to make a donation to… Continue reading

Senate must remove Trump from office | Letter to the editor

To the editor: My name is Stephen Ekholm. I am writing to… Continue reading

Let’s not repeat the mistakes of the past | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I have read a handful of letters in this… Continue reading