Medicare for All is politically popular | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

Medicare for All is overdue. While the current political excitement about shifting to a single-payer healthcare system may seem like a radically new idea, universal health insurance was actually the true goal for the architects of the 1965 Medicare Law.

One of those architects, Robert Ball, Social Security commissioner in the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations, wrote in the Winter 1995 issue of Health Affairs that, “All of us who developed Medicare and fought for it …. had been advocates of universal national health insurance. We all saw insurance for the elderly as a fallback position, which we advocated solely because it seemed to have the best change politically…. we expected Medicare to be a first step, perhaps with ‘Kiddiecare’ as another step.”

Medicare for seniors has been a public health triumph and a rousing political success.

Senators Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Kamala Harris are right to call us to complete that vision in their Medicare for All Act, Senate Bill 1129.

Eighty-eight percent of those old enough to qualify for Medicare consider its coverage excellent/good, according to a December 2018 Gallup poll, far above the 69 percent of 50-64 year-olds who consider their private insurance excellent/good.

Medicare for All isn’t a politically damaging, insurance take-away, as some political commentators such as Dick Polman (Bainbridge Review, July 5) have characterized it.

Rather it’s a health insurance upgrade to more comprehensive and less-expensive coverage even for people with satisfactory private insurance, while being a literal lifesaver for the uninsured.

Medicare for All is also politically popular; 58 percent of respondents strongly or somewhat supported the idea in a July New York Times/Survey Monkey poll, including even at least 4 percent of President Trump supporters.

It’s about time that the U.S. took that next step to universal coverage with its concomitant improved healthcare outcomes, increased worker productivity, and greater income equality.

KENT CHADWICK

Bainbridge Island

More in Letters to the Editor

King Tides highlight need for action on climate change | Letter to the editor

To the editor: As someone who has spent the better part of… Continue reading

Press city to support race and equity effort | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Our city council will soon decide how to act… Continue reading

Help get more AEDs where they’re needed | Letter to the editor

To the editor: My husband and I recently joined 18 other community-minded… Continue reading

Thanks for a great Halloween event | Letter to the editor

To the editor: A big shout out to the Bainbridge Island community… Continue reading

Senior center looks at sharing space with BIR | Letter to the editor

To the editor: As director of the Bainbridge Island Senior Community Center,… Continue reading

Vote to preserve island’s environment | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I have lived on the island for more than… Continue reading

Change of leadership needed on city council | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am guessing most of us do not really… Continue reading

Wildsmith will bring fresh ideas to council | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am writing to show support for Grayson Wildsmith… Continue reading

Candidate will fight against development | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Fellow Bainbridge Islanders, I urge you to vote for… Continue reading

Hulet is a champion for our district’s kids | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Last fall when there was a vacancy on the… Continue reading

Medina is no-show at shoreliner’s forum | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I can’t believe it. I am a shoreline homeowner… Continue reading

Fresh perspective needed on park board | Letter to the editor

To the editor: The upcoming election for the park board provides the… Continue reading