Council not interested in balance | Letter to the editor

Council not interested in balance | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

On June 6 the final report on the electric utility municipalization project on Bainbridge Island will be presented to the city council.

Presenting the report will be the consultant D. Hittle & Associates (DHA) and short comments will be allowed only from Puget Sound Energy (PSE) and Friends of Island Power (FIP). All other comments are to be given in a later session.

I can understand DHA (consultant) and PSE (resource owner) but cannot accept FIP (citizen advocacy group) being allowed to speak without including the opposition position. Why is the city council putting its finger on the scales?

Against the expressed wishes of numerous citizens, FIP persuaded a sympathetic council to fund the report to the tune of $100,000. As they did with Jefferson County before us, DHA produced a draft report in January which grossly underestimates the cost of acquiring PSE’s assets in a hostile takeover with a total financing cost of approximately $57.7 million. That number will likely rise in the final report.

PSE commissioned the independent Concentric Energy Advisors to prepare a feasibility study covering the same ground and the result was $146.8 million in the most likely scenario.

The city council has received the Concentric report but has no intention of airing it with the public. Fortunately it is available on the PSE Bainbridge website.

If our city council were truly interested in getting to the facts of the matter in a balanced fashion they would allow only the primary stakeholders (DHA and PSE) to speak June 6 and schedule a followup meeting to air the Concentric report, with again only DHA and PSE commenting. A third meeting should be scheduled to take comments from the rest of us.

I have asked this of the entire city council and city manager and received only two individual replies. Only the Hittle report will be presented and only DHA, PSE and FIP will be allowed to comment at the initial meeting. One council member suggested FIP had earned a seat at the table but would not answer why the organized opposition does not.

This has the feel of decision already made, even prior to the reports, on the part of the city council, and we are just going through the motions to provide political cover.

It could be the opposite.

Let the city council hear from you however you lean on this issue.

VARON MULLIS

Bainbridge Island

More in Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor

Land swap To the editor: With all the uproar about the hotel… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Decide now To the editor: Friday’s edition of the Bainbridge Island Review… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

CRT the enemy? To the editor: I want to thank a recent… Continue reading

Letter to the editor

CRT failed To the editor: Please, let’s approach our “moral responsibility to… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Editorial wrong To the editor: When the Bainbridge Review was sold, I… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Go for BAC To the editor: I am writing in concurrence with… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Pingo nope To the editor: So far, the Pingo app for BI… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Like Peltier To the editor: I am writing to help Bainbridge Islanders… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Support I-1362 To the editor: Washington needs a better healthcare system. The… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

Back Peltier To the editor: When deciding who deserves your vote for… Continue reading

Defendants sentenced during explosive Bainbridge trial

A low murmur spread through the already energized crowd in a hastily… Continue reading

Letters to the editor

No secret meetings To the editor: Island Center’s planning process is already… Continue reading