Spending more, getting less health coverage | Letters | July 3


July 3, 2009 · 11:13 AM

  • 0
  • Print Story
  • Letter/Editor

I learned recently that “for profit” primary care is a felony in most of the industrialized world. If you think about it, a “for profit” company is mandated by law to make a profit as its first objective. A “not for profit company” is mandated to fulfill its mission.

I would much rather deal with a bureaucrat who makes $60,000 a year whether or not my claim is paid, than an insurance representative whose job it is to figure out a way to deny my claim, making every effort to maximize corporate profitability.

I believe “for profit” secondary coverage is a great idea. This would allow people to have whatever additional coverage they can afford, without perpetuating a system where so many millions of people go without coverage at all.

It is time for the American people to realize that we as a country are spending twice as much per capita and getting far to little in return, while the CEO’s are walking away with billions...every dollar in their pockets comes from denying someone who has paid for coverage they thought they had paid for.

Lauryn Christean

High School Road

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

blog comments powered by Disqus