Farewell, John Bolton | Mel Gurtov

The firing (or, he insists, the resignation) of John Bolton as national security special assistant is being treated by some observers as a great loss for coherence and professionalism in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy.

Josh Rogin at the Washington Post, for example, writes on Sept. 11: “Republicans on Capitol Hill lost a key interlocutor and a key ally inside the White House. Many fear Trump will replace Bolton with someone who will feed Trump’s own desire to drastically pull back on U.S. commitments and alliances abroad. Even Democrats acknowledge Bolton was somebody who they knew and trusted to — at the very least — push back against Trump’s worst instincts or false beliefs.”

In short, we are invited to treat Bolton’s departure as another in a long line of “adults in the room” who are gone, leaving Trump to make policy by gut instinct. (“Trump unplugged,” as one former diplomatic put it.)

You would think we had lost a voice for peace, human rights, and international cooperation! Let’s get real: Bolton’s departure is a welcome event. His hawkish impulses, if allowed to proceed uncheck, quite possibly would have led to war with Iran, no talks with the Taliban in Afghanistan, continued “maximum pressure” on North Korea and Venezuela, and further sanctions against Cuba and Nicaragua. Yes, Bolton was an “adult” when it came to sanctions on Russia, support for NATO, and Trump’s glad-handing of dictators. But on balance, Bolton was as much a menace to real national and international security as his boss.

Various foreign-policy professionals are being quoted as concluding that with Bolton gone, Trump will have the field to himself, with only Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and friends to restrain him. That is indeed worrisome, since Pompeo has been just as militant as Bolton on Venezuela, North Korea, and Iran.

The main difference between the two is Pompeo’s loyalty — his willingness to bite his tongue and go along with whatever Trump says or does. U.S. foreign policy will be no less incoherent and erratic in a Bolton-less world. But at least with Bolton gone, we have one less voice for war in Washington.

Mel Gurtov, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University.

More in Opinion

In For A Dime, In For A Dollar | Steve Klinger

Many years ago, when we played what we called “penny-ante poker,” there… Continue reading

The Rights of Nature | Robert C. Koehler

“When the U.S. Constitution was ratified, women, indigenous peoples, and slaves were… Continue reading

Wildsmith brings new perspective to council | Letter to the editor

To the editor: We are writing in support of candidate Grayson Wildsmith… Continue reading

Wildsmith offers a fresh perspective | Letter to the editor

To the editor: My wife and I strongly support the candidacy of… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Tuesday, Oct. 15

Today’s cartoon is by John Darkow, Columbia, Missouri.… Continue reading

Oddo wants to serve our island community | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am writing to support Anthony Oddo for the… Continue reading

Candidate ‘gets it’ on environmental issues | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I strongly support Kirsten Hytopolous in her efforts to… Continue reading

Today’s cartoon for Monday, Oct. 14

Today’s cartoon is by Vladimir Kazanevsky, Ukraine, PoliticalCartoons.com.… Continue reading

Ewing is passionate and highly qualified | Letter to the editor

To the editor: We are writing to endorse the candidacy of Andrew… Continue reading

Most Read