An Unfortunate Revelation on Securing North Korean Nukes | Mel Gurtov

Specialists on North Korea have cited many reasons over the years for why China cannot be relied on to stop the DPRK from continuing its nuclear and missile buildup.

The reasons are by now quite familiar, and have mostly to do with China’s fear that pressuring Kim Jong-un’s regime will destabilize it and produce a chaotic situation adverse to China’s security interests. Yet U.S. administrations have consistently proposed that China is the key to resolving the standoff with North Korea — that if only Beijing would exploit its economic and political leverage with Pyongyang, Kim will be forced to knuckle under.

Today’s news that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson had, perhaps unintentionally, revealed ongoing U.S. efforts to coordinate with China on the removal of North Korea’s nuclear weapons in the event of a political collapse in Pyongyang further undermines the notion that China has usable leverage. North Korean experts read the newspapers! They have surely known for a long time — and today’s news only reinforces it — about U.S.-China consultations on North Korean nukes. Now Tillerson has confirmed them, saying, “We’ve had conversations with the Chinese about how that [removing the nukes] might be done.” U.S. sources may say that their Chinese counterparts have resisted reaching an agreement that would avoid a clash should both armies move into North Korea in the wake of a collapse. But the North Koreans have no reason to believe that, and every reason to think this is further evidence of Chinese-American collusion to undermine their regime and occupy their country.

To be sure, if the day ever comes when the Kim dynasty implodes, securing nuclear weapons will be important, and ensuring against a clash between Chinese and U.S. forces will be essential.

But raising these matters in public could not come at a worse time, for it only confirms the North Koreans in the view that regime change is a common subject of discussion between Washington and Beijing. Their suspicions can only further undermine what little remains of Tillerson’s idea of direct U.S.-DPRK talks without preconditions — and give North Korea’s hawks more reason to push for completing work on nuclear-tipped ICBMs.

Mel Gurtov, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University and editor-in-chief of Asian Perspective. His most recent book is “Will This Be China’s Century? A Skeptic’s View” (Lynne Rienner, 2013).

More in Opinion

Trump’s 73rd week in office | In cartoons

This is not going to end soon. Or end very pretty. We’re… Continue reading

Congrats, Class of 2018 | In Our Opinion

We have great expectations for you, Class of 2018. Even though eyes… Continue reading

Trump Wants Credit. Don’t Give Him Any | John L. Micek

Earlier this week, U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., thought reports of children… Continue reading

A primary vote that matters | The Petri Dish

Washington may have a meaningful Presidential Primary in 2020. If it happens,… Continue reading

Will Trump’s Kid Cruelty Sink the GOP in November? | Dick Polman

It may seem crass to discuss the potential political impact of Trump’s… Continue reading

Should College Freshmen Pick Their Own Roommates? | Tyrades!

According to the Washington Post, at some universities, nearly 50 percent of… Continue reading

Boom Times in the Golden State | Peter Funt

SAN FRANCISCO - Welcome to the Hotel California. You can check out… Continue reading

What Happened? Assessing the Singapore Summit | Mel Gurtov

“Peace and prosperity,” “lasting and stable peace,” “peace regime,” “denuclearization,” “new U.S.-DPRK… Continue reading

Hey Leadership! Let Congress Work | Lee H. Hamilton

There aren’t many people who would argue that Congress is working well… Continue reading

Most Read