A lesson in listening | In Our Opinion

  • Monday, January 8, 2018 7:30am
  • Opinion

It really wasn’t that complex.

The three newest members of the Bainbridge Island City Council made good on a campaign promise this week and voted to kill the controversial proposal to build a $3 million pedestrian-bicyclist bridge over Highway 305 near Vineyard Lane.

The 5-2 vote came after two hours of public testimony, much of it in favor of the bridge.

Supporters said the bridge would be a vital connection to linking two sides of Winslow split by the highway, and the bridge itself — which would create a new access point to the Sound to Olympics Trail — had been talked about for more than a decade.

But while the bridge enjoyed a bit of local support — from islanders anxious about climate change and eager to get people out of their cars, to some walkers and cyclists — it was viewed by most as an expensive boondoggle in the wrong place and at the wrong time.

Yes, the city’s share of the project, roughly $1 million in general fund money, could and should be spent elsewhere. The suggestion for more immediate roadside improvements for walkers and cyclists is one worthy idea, but let’s not forget we still have a much more needed piece of public infrastructure in the pipeline that lacks adequate funding: a new police station.

Many of those who spoke at this week’s council meeting urged the council to delay its decision, so new council members could become more informed about the proposed 305 bridge.

That mood was mirrored by Councilman Mike Scott, who called the public’s nickname for the proposed span, the “Bridge to Nowhere,” a “mindless phrase” and complained that the debate over the bridge had been “not a very thoughtful discussion.”

Truth be told, the bridge debate was pretty simple stuff. In the real estate world, the mantra is “location, location, location.”

Same here with the 305 span. The “Bridge to Nowhere” label stuck, and stung, because it rang so true.

Councilman Scott said he hoped his new council colleagues would be open to accepting new information in their spots on the dais, some of which will no doubt be different than what they’d heard on the campaign trail.

Our view comes a different perspective. We hope Councilman Scott and the rest of the council not forget or discount what they’ve been told by the public, outside of council chambers or the bubble of committee meetings.

More in Opinion

Stan Lee’s Message Lives On | Tyrades!

My lunch got off to a bad start on November 12 because… Continue reading

Blue Wave Meets Red Wall: Split decision for a Divided Nation | Dick Polman

Charles Dickens wrote this about the French Revolution: “It was the best… Continue reading

The Issues That Won’t Go Away | Robert C. Koehler

How much real change manifested itself in the 2018 midterms? How deeply… Continue reading

Dogs Get Their Day in Florida Voting | Peter Funt

FORT MYERS, Florida - Amid the brouhaha over senate and gubernatorial voting,… Continue reading

Hillary Clinton’s Defeat Became a Pink Wave | Matthew Johnson

This year Cambridge Scholar Publishers issued a book edited by Barry University… Continue reading

Activists Looking Beyond Midterm Elections | Rob Okun

Since Donald Trump’s selection as president two years ago, a growing movement… Continue reading

In remembrance: Stan Lee

Cartoonists from around the world penned tributes this week to Stan Lee,… Continue reading

Paying public officials what they are worth | Letter to the editor

To the editor: In the Oct. 5, 2018 edition of the Islander,… Continue reading

Bainbridge council is making a short-sighted choice | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I just returned home from my volunteer job at… Continue reading

Most Read