Expediency or quagmires — you decide

"Point of order, please!That was the request from the gallery, when our old friend Lois Andrus called us earlier this week. After last Wednesday's split city council vote on the Woodland Village subdivision - in which Mayor Dwight Sutton declined to cast a deciding vote to break a 3-3 tie - Andrus insists that lacking majority support, the issue is settled in the negative.Once you have a vote, and you announce the results of the vote, it's over - period, Andrus told us. I even went out and bought 'Robert's Rules of Order' to find out."

  • Wednesday, March 29, 2000 12:00pm
  • News

“Point of order, please!That was the request from the gallery, when our old friend Lois Andrus called us earlier this week. After last Wednesday’s split city council vote on the Woodland Village subdivision – in which Mayor Dwight Sutton declined to cast a deciding vote to break a 3-3 tie – Andrus insists that lacking majority support, the issue is settled in the negative.Once you have a vote, and you announce the results of the vote, it’s over – period, Andrus told us. I even went out and bought ‘Robert’s Rules of Order’ to find out.Ah, Robert’s Rules, the road map for the well-run public meeting. We had to confess we hadn’t looked at that venerable tome since a student leadership class in, oh, seventh grade. Goodness knows that was a while ago.So we put in a call to Mayor Dwight Sutton, who said Andrus’ point was well taken, but that the question is under discussion amongst the administration and the city attorney. Expect a debate over procedure at the next council meeting, at which point there could be a motion to reconsider, a tie-breaking vote by Sutton – or the split vote could stand, leaving the Woodland project in the lurch. If the council says, ‘yes, we’re happy with (the vote),’ it dies, Sutton said.Woodland Village has been as much an educational process for the neighbors as a nightmare for the developer, so this latest turn probably shouldn’t surprise anyone. Both sides have had enough trouble coming to grips with the simple idea that after a point, the public record is closed, and the council must be left to its own deliberations. (So to the red-haired fellow in the gallery caught trying to slip notes to Christine Nasser during the council debate last Wednesday – not so fast, friend. Whichever side you’re on, we’re sure that it’s been adequately represented.) But there is a larger question here – does the Bainbridge Island community still want a land-use appeals process that includes the city council? Many cities, after all, don’t, meaning anyone unhappy with a hearing examiner’s decision on a subdivision, a cellular tower or what have you must take it straight to Superior Court.Much ado is sometimes made about our deliberately unwieldy process. So perhaps it is time to ask ourselves once again as citizens, do we want more expedience in land-use decisions, or more of the legal and political quagmires that seem to puddle up every time a project like Woodland Village comes along?Having sat through countless quasi-judicial council hearings over the years, we can see both sides here. Councilman Jim Llewellyn has for months argued that the council should put more faith in a hearing examiner’s recommendations – in his words, that’s what we pay them for. Last week, an attorney from the city’s insurance pool urged the council to resist temptation and not fiddle about with projects that have already spent months or years going through the planning staff and hearings before the examiner. A former council member once told us that the dirty little secret to making such appellate decisions is to first decide how you want to vote, then find whatever evidence you can in the record to support it. We have no doubt it’s a view shared, if only in their hearts, by more than one member of the council now.Some council members, and we dare say most of the local development community, would be happier to do away with the council appeal process altogether. But while it might make for fewer and shorter meetings, we think most citizens would opt to remain mired in the current process.After all, there’s something reassuring in knowing that if a decision is going to be botched, by gum, it’s going to be our council that does the botching.Now, about that point of order…”

More in News

The rare ice bear of Bainbridge | Photo of the day

Grin and bear it: One of the bear sculptures outside the Chevron… Continue reading

Great Decisions at the Library presents ‘The New Geopolitical Equation’

Great Decisions at the Library returns at 9:30 a.m. Saturday, Feb. 24… Continue reading

Democratic lawmakers unveil conflicting budget proposals | 2018 Legislative Session

OLYMPIA - Democrats in both chambers of the state Legislature are at… Continue reading

Spread your wings | Photo of the day 2.2o

The totem pole outside the Camp Yeomalt Cabin spreads its wings between… Continue reading

Sundance and Winston are this week’s adoptable pets

This week’s adoptable pets are Sundance and Winston. For adoption through PAWS:… Continue reading

Ground-breaking, boundary bashing: Island Cub Scouts welcome first-ever girls to the pack

A boys’ club no more, Bainbridge Island’s Cub Scout Pack 4496 is… Continue reading

Bainbridge blotter | Nosy neighbor

Selected reports from the Bainbridge Island Police Department blotter. SUNDAY, JAN. 28… Continue reading

Lawmakers clash over gun legislation amid another discussion on mass shootings | 2018 Legislative Session

OLYMPIA - Washington state lawmakers introduced a multitude of bills early this… Continue reading

Feel the rush | Photo of the day 2.19

Fred Grimm pushes a pile of just-cut rush stems out of the… Continue reading

Most Read