Policy priorities prompt spat on council
June 9, 2008 · Updated 6:32 PM
Tooloees move to advance his own policies is opposed by fellow councilors.
Enacting environmental and land use regulations favored by one city council member wont top the citys to-do list next year.
Councilman Nezam Tooloee failed to gain the councils support for a series of policy deadlines and budget priorities during a contentious discussion at last weeks council meeting.
A resolution drafted by Tooloee was aimed at ensuring that his favored policies many of them related to the citys Critical Areas Ordinance do not fall by the wayside among city staff.
We need to be on a cooperative track with the city administration in getting things done rather than micromanaging the city administration, said Councilman Bill Knobloch, who expressed concerns that Tooloees resolution would over-burden city staff. Lets stop looking over the shoulder of our city administrators.
Tooloee sharply disagreed with Knoblochs characterization of the resolution.
This resolution has no work load impact this year, he said. Anyone trying to characterize these policies which are significant policies as micromanaging clearly has no appreciation for policy.
Tooloees resolution would have set deadlines for the city to enact already approved programs and policies, which he said would protect the island water supply and amend the Critical Areas Ordinance for more flexible land use.
His resolution also highlighted earlier council decisions that would promote wildlife corridors and the citys shoreline stewardship program.
Tooloee wanted to set Dec. 31 of this year as the implementation date for many of his resolutions policies.
This simply organizes the information and makes it easy to refer to and easy to look up information, said Tooloee. These policies, right now, are only written up in the minutes from workshops we did last year. Many citizens committees and staff and other people are asking where they are because they didnt know about them.
Councilman Jim Llewellyn backed Tooloees proposal, calling it a good idea that would establish a clear view of what the council had intended during discussions last year.
But other councilors said policies proposed by Tooloee should follow the same path as other recently adopted policies.
This is essentially marching orders, Councilman Chris Snow said.
Once approved by the council, new city policies are typically implemented based on importance and immediacy of need. Integral changes to the CAO might see rapid implementation, while the citys new heritage tree program might experience some lag time, Knobloch said.
Tooloee called efforts to quash his resolution as bordering on arrogance, before he was reprimanded by Mayor Darlene Kordonowy for speaking out of turn and in a manner disrespectful of fellow councilors.
While supporting the spirit of some of the policies, Councilman Kjell Stoknes said he feared that Tooloees resolution would create redundancy in city government, set unnecessary deadlines and endanger funding for other high-priority policies.
The chief concern for me was that (Tooloees) policies would be mandated with a fixed time period, Stoknes said Thursday. As a result, it gives these policies a foot in the door over other programs that are more critical. I dont want to put the council in a box on the budget.
Stoknes also stressed that the current council is different than the one that approved many of Tooloees policies. Both Stoknes and Snow had not yet been elected to the council when the policies were approved last year.
Nezam has a very strong personality and pushes hard for what he wants, said Stoknes. But we dont all have the same reality. I respect his reality, but its not necessarily the same as mine.
Tooloee agreed to send his resolution back to the councils Land Use Committee for further review.