News

Charter, park levy going down to defeat

It wasn't a proposal for district-only balloting that killed the proposed new Kitsap County charter, former freeholders and members of the pro-charter Committee for Better Representation said Tuesday night.

It wasn't a plank to create a new county executive, either, or a provision for nonpartisan elections.

To hear charter supporters during an election-night gathering at the Givens Community Center in Port Orchard, the charter was done in by a lack of voter

awareness and the local Democratic Party leadership.

Whatever the reason, the charter looked doomed for failure in early results released Tuesday evening. With 44,600 ballots counted, Kitsap County voters were rejecting the measure by a margin of 54.91 percent (24,489) opposed and 45.09

percent (20,111) in favor.

County Auditor Karen Flynn estimated that approximately 19,000 votes remain to be counted before the election is certified Feb. 15. Sixty-two percent of the remaining votes would have to be “yes” for the charter to be approved.

"There are so many ballots out there that conceivably the results could change," Flynn said. "But it appears unlikely, given that the trend would have to change so

substantially."

Also apparently failing was the Bainbridge Island Park and Recreation District maintenance and operations levy. The two-year, $4.78 million levy, was earning 57 percent support; as an excess levy, it needed 60 percent approval to pass.

Updated results were to be released Thursday afternoon on the Kitsap County website, www.kitsapgov.com.

Flynn might not have been willing to declare the charter defeated, but supporters of the proposal were.

Marcus Hoffman, one of the 21 freeholders elected to write the charter, said “lack of awareness” caused voters to reject it.

"When people don't know," the Silverdale resident said, "they vote 'No.'

"Instead of moving into the 21st century, Kitsap County will be stuck in the 19th century," Hoffman added. "And that's a shame."

Most charter proponents expected a close election, given that the measure to initiate the home rule movement was approved by just 51 percent of voters in November 2000.

Losing by nearly 10 percentage points was a shock to those who gathered at Givens.

"If it was going to pass, it was going to pass by one vote -- mine," said Gene David Hart, a Bremerton resident and chair of the Committee for Better Representation. "So, yeah, I was surprised by how it went down."

Hart, who often made a point of identifying himself as a Democrat during a largely partisan charter campaign, blamed the "establishment" of his own party for torpedoing

the measure.

"You've got 21 citizens (the freeholders) who gave all that time, all that energy," Hart said. "To have the Democratic leadership thow that away because of partisanship is a

travesty."

The charter would have made most elected offices nonpartisan, which opponents argued would have allowed candidates to obscure their views on important issues.

Kitsap Democrats also opposed a charter provision for district-only council elections and said the proposed county executive would have become too powerful. Charter

opponents also said the new form of government would become too expensive, siphoning off funds otherwise available for key programs and services.

Jim Martin, a former freeholder who was instrumental in initiating the charter process, said his side failed to get its message across.

"If (voters) had understood, they'd have voted for it overwhelmingly," the Port Orchard resident said. "And I don't know how we could have explained it any better."

None of those asked expected another charter effort to come up in the near future. Hoffman said it would take "at least 10 years" for another group to attempt to pass a

charter in Kitsap County.

Martin figured it would take even longer.

"It took 30 years for this to come around again" since a previous charter movement was started in Kitsap County, Martin said. "I'd expect it would be another 30."

Vince Dice is editor of the Central Kitsap Reporter, the Review’s sister paper in Silverdale.

Community Events, April 2014

Add an Event
We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Apr 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.