Vote against lame-duck shenanigans | Letter to the editor

To the editor:

Unfortunately, there has been a persistent view that the proposed bridge over Highway 305 traversing between Knechtel and Vineyard Lane is primarily one that benefits and is promoted by the residents of the Vineyard Lane condominium community.

This is false. The Board of Directors of the Vineyard Lane Owners Association voted unanimously this week to strongly oppose construction of a bridge (some individual residents have offered their own opinions). With the completion of the STO path (which itself was costly in terms of both construction and “destruction”), there is simply no need for a bridge. Indeed, support for this bridge is essentially based on a grand pipe dream by special interests, bureaucrats and a single vote majority on the city council that if realized, will result in even more clear cutting, expense, and disruption.

For what purpose? Let’s use the millions that will be wasted on a bridge “to nowhere” on widening road shoulders to provide safer bicycling and pedestrian use and other more useful and cost-effective projects that have genuine and larger benefit for our community.

Four of the six candidates for the three city council vacancies have stated they oppose this bridge: Rasham Nassar, Joe Deets, Kevin Fetterly and Matt Tirman.

At least one council seat is certain to convert the Council to a majority in opposition to the bridge in January (three existing members of the council not up for election already oppose the bridge).

It is nothing short of a disgrace that the lame duck city council members who support this bridge continue to spend hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars on design concepts for a bridge project that, assuming they do as promised, is going to be scrapped after the first of the year by the new council.

Indeed, every penny now being spent on the design preferences of the bridge (and the biased design “survey” being conducted by the city — which ignores a “no bridge” option) is money down the drain, or worse, used to justify spending even more later.

Had enough? Vote for Rasham Nassar, Joe Deets or Kevin Fetterly, and Matt Tirman.

MITCH WILK

Bainbridge Island

More in Letters to the Editor

Build new station in original location | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Again we have a threatening situation at our High… Continue reading

The choice looks easy to me | Letter to the editor

To the editor: So Trump told the NRA, in the UK, “They… Continue reading

Legacy of Messenger House should continue | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am a third generation Bainbridge Islander who is… Continue reading

Development rules need to change | Letter to the editor

To the editor Bainbridge Island is arguably one of the most beautiful… Continue reading

Foundation fosters student learning | Letter to the editor

To the editor: As a teacher at Eagle Harbor High School, I… Continue reading

Our politicians deserve our scrutiny | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Embarrassing, as defined, means “causing embarrassment” and synonyms include… Continue reading

Highway 305 bridge is a safety issue | Letter to the editor

To the editor Early in his campaign, Matt Tirman, who had not… Continue reading

Congress has our tax money, so let’s tell them how to spend it | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Kudos to the AARP volunteers helping with people with… Continue reading

Some things never seem to change | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Eighteen years and counting these same traffic issues remain:… Continue reading

Volunteer work won’t cost a penny | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Echoing Dave Shorett’s letter to the Review (April 20),… Continue reading

Foundation grant gets things cooking at Wilkes | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Thank you, BSF! “I’m super lucky,” I thought as… Continue reading

Council, city hall ignore the voters | Letter to the editor

To the editor: How did we get from an overwhelming rejection of… Continue reading