Private utility customers are protected | Letter to the editor

Private utility customers are protected

To the editor:

Citizen oversight is meaningless for public utilities. This is in strong evidence given runaway power rates for the San Juan County public utility OPALCO, and a citizen lawsuit against Jefferson County PUD condemning its secret “executive” meetings.

Delyle Ellefson’s Nov. 25 letter compares PSE’s rates to the rates that OPALCO. He complains that the energy rate he pays to PSE — per kilowatt-hour — is “consistently around 10 percent higher” than the rate he pays to OPALCO.

What Mr. Ellefson doesn’t say, however, is that OPALCO saddles its customers with a massively regressive rate design. All residential users, including low-usage customers such as poorer households, get hit with a monthly facility charge of $40.54 — a charge that exceeds PSE’s equivalent charge by well over 400 percent. This OPALCO facility charge is projected to be $78 per month by 2019, largely due to significant costs for undergrounding. That facility charge is additional to any power usage. Oversight by the WUTC would never allow such significant and regressive increases.

Further, OPALCO charges a preferential lower energy rate to its high-usage customers. This low rate does not encourage energy conservation.

Unlike OPALCO, PSE doesn’t punish its low-usage customers with an exorbitant facility charge. And unlike OPALCO, PSE promotes conservation with an energy rate that goes up as consumption goes up. Unlike JPUD, there are no secret rate meetings before the WUTC.

Let’s stick with PSE and its progressive rates. The WUTC only oversees three private electric utilities, and they do protect PSE customers.

BOB JAYNE

Crystal Springs

More in Letters to the Editor

King Tides highlight need for action on climate change | Letter to the editor

To the editor: As someone who has spent the better part of… Continue reading

Press city to support race and equity effort | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Our city council will soon decide how to act… Continue reading

Help get more AEDs where they’re needed | Letter to the editor

To the editor: My husband and I recently joined 18 other community-minded… Continue reading

Thanks for a great Halloween event | Letter to the editor

To the editor: A big shout out to the Bainbridge Island community… Continue reading

Senior center looks at sharing space with BIR | Letter to the editor

To the editor: As director of the Bainbridge Island Senior Community Center,… Continue reading

Vote to preserve island’s environment | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I have lived on the island for more than… Continue reading

Change of leadership needed on city council | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am guessing most of us do not really… Continue reading

Wildsmith will bring fresh ideas to council | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I am writing to show support for Grayson Wildsmith… Continue reading

Candidate will fight against development | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Fellow Bainbridge Islanders, I urge you to vote for… Continue reading

Hulet is a champion for our district’s kids | Letter to the editor

To the editor: Last fall when there was a vacancy on the… Continue reading

Medina is no-show at shoreliner’s forum | Letter to the editor

To the editor: I can’t believe it. I am a shoreline homeowner… Continue reading

Fresh perspective needed on park board | Letter to the editor

To the editor: The upcoming election for the park board provides the… Continue reading